Motley Rice - Attorneys at Law
Navigation
Main navigation
Motley Rice represents clients across many areas.
Learn about the cases Motley Rice is actively representing clients in or cases that we've litigated previously.
Ozempic® users are filing lawsuits for vision loss, ileus, and other serious injuries.
Lawsuits allege talcum powder use is linked to reproductive organ cancer for women.
Lawsuits allege toxic heavy metals in baby food damage infants’ brain development.
Social media companies are being sued over alleged teenage mental health harms.
Meta is being sued for teenage mental health harms allegedly caused by Facebook and Instagram.
Women hurt by birth control drugs and devices may be eligible to sue over their injuries.
Studies link hair relaxers to uterine/ovarian cancer. Lawsuits seek to hold companies accountable.
Family members may have been eligible to file Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuits.
People are filing gastroparesis lawsuits after using drugs like Ozempic®, Wegovy® and Mounjaro™.
While litigation can take years to complete from start to finish, our firm is always working for our clients, no matter how long it takes or how hard it gets.
Motley Rice attorneys and support personnel are dedicated to representing clients and working with co-counsel located throughout the United States and around the world.
Comprehensive, up-to-date news on the issues surrounding the litigation areas of Motley Rice LLC.
News, Learn about the latest happenings from lawsuits and other events impacting plaintiffs.
Motley Rice lawyers share their insights on litigation and more to inform people exploring their legal options.
This case is no longer active
Missed Earnings Projections: Hewlett Packard
The Legal Team
Misinformation can be spread by product manufacturers or organizations attempting to make their companies’ outlook appear more positive than it actually is. When the reality of a company’s situation is revealed, however, it can result in a major decline in stock price.
On Sept. 15, 2014, the court granted final approval of a $57 million settlement made between Hewlett-Packard and its investors for HP allegedly misleading them about the company’s plans to expand on its webOS development projects.
Investors alleged that Hewlett-Packard misled them about its ability to expand its emerging webOS “mini-ecosystem” (consisting of the TouchPad and two smartphones) to a full-fledged ecosystem of hundreds of millions of “seamlessly” connected webOS-enabled PCs and printers, all within the short timeframe of less than two years. After Hewlett-Packard abandoned webOS development in August 2011, the company’s stock price declined significantly.
Motley Rice served as co-lead counsel in the case.
The case is In re Hewlett-Packard Co. Securities Litigation, No. SACV 11-1404 AG (RNBx) (C.D. Cal.). Lead Plaintiffs were Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Union Asset Management Holding AG, Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada, and the LIUNA National (Industrial) Pension Fund and LIUNA Staff & Affiliates Pension Fund.
The period for joining this class action has ended, but settlement documentation is available here for reference:
If you have questions regarding cases similar to the In re Hewlett-Packard Co Securities Litigation settlement or if you would like to discuss a potential case, contact securities attorney Gregg Levin by email or call 1.800.768.4026.
*Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.