Motley Rice - Attorneys at Law
Navigation
Main navigation
Motley Rice represents clients across many areas.
Learn about the cases Motley Rice is actively representing clients in or cases that we've litigated previously.
Ozempic® users are filing lawsuits for vision loss, ileus, and other serious injuries.
Lawsuits allege talcum powder use is linked to reproductive organ cancer for women.
Lawsuits allege toxic heavy metals in baby food damage infants’ brain development.
Social media companies are being sued over alleged teenage mental health harms.
Meta is being sued for teenage mental health harms allegedly caused by Facebook and Instagram.
Women hurt by birth control drugs and devices may be eligible to sue over their injuries.
Studies link hair relaxers to uterine/ovarian cancer. Lawsuits seek to hold companies accountable.
Family members may have been eligible to file Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuits.
People are filing gastroparesis lawsuits after using drugs like Ozempic®, Wegovy® and Mounjaro™.
While litigation can take years to complete from start to finish, our firm is always working for our clients, no matter how long it takes or how hard it gets.
Motley Rice attorneys and support personnel are dedicated to representing clients and working with co-counsel located throughout the United States and around the world.
Comprehensive, up-to-date news on the issues surrounding the litigation areas of Motley Rice LLC.
News, Learn about the latest happenings from lawsuits and other events impacting plaintiffs.
Motley Rice lawyers share their insights on litigation and more to inform people exploring their legal options.
This case is no longer active
Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator Leads
The Legal Team
Dealing with a sudden onset of arrhythmia, or an irregular heartbeat, can be a frightening experience, especially when the condition can lead to a potentially fatal cardiac arrest. Implantable defibrillators are often used to monitor these fast, abnormal heartbeats by sending an electric shock to the heart when it detects irregular behavior.
Unfortunately, a number of Sprint Fidelis heart defibrillators made by Medronic, Inc. were found to have faulty electrodes—the small wires running to the heart that deliver the shock—that can either misfire at unnecessary times or fail to fire when needed most.
Motley Rice actively litigated cases involving Medtronic defibrillator patients who suffered from injury or complications involving the Sprint Fidelis® lead component.
Motley Rice is no longer accepting Sprint Fidelis cases. If you have a question about the Sprint Fidelis federal multidistrict litigation, contact attorney John Duane by email or call 1.800.768.4026. Fred Thompson, the leader of Motley Rice's Medical team, served on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee for the MDL.
Oct. 14, 2007Medtronic, Inc., announced a defect in the Sprint Fidelis lead component of its heart defibrillator. The company identified a potentially high rate of fracture of the Sprint Fidelis electrical wires, which can alter the device's ability to accurately read heart rhythms. This defect may cause the device to misfire and shock the patient, or the device may fail to provide a critical, life-saving shock to the patient. The New York Times reported that the defect in this electrical wire has resulted in hundreds of malfunctions and may have played a role in the death of five Medtronic defibrillator patients.
According to the FDA, approximately 268,000 patients were implanted with a Sprint Fidelis lead as part of a Medtronic defibrillator as of 2007. Affected models of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads are:
All patients who have received the Medtronic defibrillator since 2004 are urged to visit their doctor to check for potential fractures.
In conjunction with the announcement, Medtronic recommended that all doctors stop the use of Sprint Fidelis leads in patients using its defibrillators. In addition, Medtronic suspended worldwide distribution and recalled all leads not in use. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) endorsed the recall.
Read more about medical device litigation.